12 Comments

Ben A Said,
March 18th, 2009 @1:32 am  

I would say the D80 is a good enough body as long as you couple it with top-notch lenses, select the right filters etc. I use a D70 and whilst I’m still very much a beginner, I took shots at a wedding earlier this year which were almost as good as those taken by the professional photographer.

If I were you, I’d start with the D80, get as much as you can out of it, then go for a more expensive model later on.
References :

carolina e Said,
March 18th, 2009 @2:00 am  

is good enough, sometime is not the camera, is the photographer, so if you have a good computer program…don’t worry.
References :

Slighly Amused Said,
March 18th, 2009 @2:12 am  

The camera is only as good as the photographer.
References :

Chaz Said,
March 18th, 2009 @2:39 am  

Yes. If YOU are good enough, then the D80 is good enough.

If you want to see over 300,000 samples of wedding photographs taken with the D80, go here: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=wedding&cm=nikon%2Fd80

If you want to see one that will make you laugh your BUTT off, go here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/smoothdude/1313067404/ I guess love is in the air…

And look! I think this one is our own Kristina: http://www.flickr.com/photos/igorbabenko/1553392010/

References :

mcbozburger Said,
March 18th, 2009 @3:17 am  

In short, YES, the D80 is an awesome camera but I'd be more worried about the lenses – I use
70-200 VR nikon – good for stuff you cant get close enough to.
28-70mm nikon all-round awesome lens
50mm f1-4d for portraits – good for the bride getting ready beforehand etc

And a few filters, other bits and bobs etc.

Remember, its you that matters, not the camera anyway.

Hope this helps and good luck!
References :
ProPhotog

Fotoz 4 FX photography Said,
March 18th, 2009 @3:41 am  

Either one will produce professional images provided someone professional is using them.

Remember something… the camera is a tool… nothing more.

Professional images are the result of photography (painting with light) and if you can’t paint, you are only wasting the canvas.

References :
Professional Photog: http://jpgmag.com/people/Galan

andy w Said,
March 18th, 2009 @3:59 am  

It is not the camera, it is the photographer who produces the “professional” part of the picture.
The camera is a tool and a skilled photographer can produce the goods with what they are given.

References :

screwdriver Said,
March 18th, 2009 @4:38 am  

As has already been said the lenses matter a lot more than the camera body. The D80 is fine.

Wide aperture lenses, particularly the longer focal lengths allow you to blur the background as well as being useful for interior shots without flash (not all churches allow flash during the ceremony), it all helps to give your pictures the quality that Uncle Fred can't do.

With everybody and their Grandmother using digital cameras these days a lot of couples think they can save money by having a relative take the pics, they're wrong of course, but you have to use every trick in the book just to get the business and making your pictures better by differential focusing on some of the more intimate shots definitely helps.

Chris
References :

brian.parkhurst@btinternet.com Said,
March 18th, 2009 @4:56 am  

I went for the D200,it handles well and gives 5 fps,which is great for the throwing the confetti shots,even on RAW.You don’t have to wait for another burst of shots either.I saw a local pro wedding portfolio recently,peoples’ rear ends,sloping shots with all the drunks in the background.That wasn’t the fault of their D80.The D200 doesn’t have easy modes, only ap and sp with 1 programmed.Dust can be cleaned off.I use a Nikon 18-200 for most jobs,a 10-20 for landscapes and large groups,an old 50m macro for jewelry and odd close ups,and most important,even with a goo VR,a tripod. The D300 is great but a bit dear yet.
References :
Photographer and lecturer for many years.

Ara57 Said,
March 18th, 2009 @5:12 am  

If I were buying a new body for professional use, I would get the D300, mostly for its stellar high ISO performance. Outside of that, any camera you decide on is limited by the ability of the photographer and not by the specs of the hardware.
References :

Nathan Grammatico Said,
March 18th, 2009 @5:24 am  

Good Morning.

No Doubt, the Nikon D80 is a fantastic camera. However, the Nikon D200 is a better camera, it’s a pro-sumer camera, whereby the Nikon D80 is Bridge camera. Also, when you’re holding the D80, you’ll wish it had a weather-proof magnesium alloy body as the D200 has ( The Nikon D80 is made of plastic, just as the Nikon D40 ). Sure, the Nikon D80 would be Good for professional wedding photographs, but the Nikon D200 would be better. It’s a higher class of camera- so you’ll have higher class results. As you’ve noticed, the Nikon D200 is more expensive. IN wedding photography, and photography in general, you can have a 10,000$ camera, and a 100$ lens, and get so-so results.

So, if you get the Nikon D200- you should get a good lens with it, a good lens is the 18-200mm VR lens, it’s a marvelous lens. Here’s a side by side of these cameras:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=nikon_d80%2Cnikon_d200&show=all

I’m for the D200.
References :

Edwin Said,
March 18th, 2009 @6:04 am  

For the umpteenth time IT ISN’T THE CAMERA ITS THE PHOTOGRAPHER.

If you have no experience with an SLR and no training in photography then don’t expect “professional looking” photographs regardless of what camera you buy.
References :

Recent Post

Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be hand modified by our authors so any unsuitable comments will be removed and you comments will be appreared after approved